The Call Advocates Women's Suffrage - Revision history

Aiobrec13 at 23:45, 30 June 2014

2014-06-30T23:45:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 30 June 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:

	''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''		''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''


	After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.		After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.

Aiobrec13: Re-formatted Page

2014-06-30T23:37:48Z

Re-formatted Page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 30 June 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:

	''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''		''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''


	After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.		After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.

Aiobrec13 at 23:36, 30 June 2014

2014-06-30T23:36:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 30 June 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''		''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''


	John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.		John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.
Line 13:		Line 14:

	'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."'''		'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."'''

	''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''		''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''

Aiobrec13: Added Photo Credits

2014-06-30T23:36:16Z

Added Photo Credits

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 30 June 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[[image:callsupport.jpg]]		[[image:callsupport.jpg]]

	''Image ~~in [[~~The ~~Sixth Star\|The Sixth Star]]~~''		''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''


	John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.		John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.
Line 14:		Line 13:

	'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."'''		'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."'''
			''Image: The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, California''

	After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.		After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.

Aiobrec13: Created new page

2014-06-30T23:20:37Z

Created new page

New page

''' Historical Essay '''

''By Mae Silver, excerpted from [[The Sixth Star|The Sixth Star]]''

[[image:callsupport.jpg]]

''Image in [[The Sixth Star|The Sixth Star]]''

John D. Spreckels, the eldest son of the famous sugar millionaire Claus Spreckels, was the editor of The Call, which not only advocated women’s suffrage, but provided a worthy historical trail of the activities of the women’s suffrage campaign of 1911. The Call distinguished itself as distinctly separate from the liquor establishment in San Francisco when it declared its aggressive support for suffrage on the front page of the Sunday edition, August 6, 1911.

[[image:Call_article_women_lead_in_battle.jpeg]]

'''When The Call could have asked its colleagues to "eat crow."'''

After the October 10, 1911 election, when both leading San Francisco papers, the Examiner and Chronicle, declared suffrage dead again, The Call reminded everybody that all the votes were not yet counted. Actually, The Call predicted that suffrage would win by 4,000 votes! The final margin was 3,587. In this article, The Call pointed out how the rest of the San Francisco papers were wrong and only it was right. So it was. Good reporting.

[[1894 Midwinter Fair: WOMEN ARTISTS, an appreciation|Prev. Document]] [[WOMEN CLAIM THE VOTE IN CALIFORNIA|Next Document]]

[[category:1850s]][[category:1860s]][[category:1870s]][[category:1880s]][[category:Dissent]][[category:Labor]][[category:Newspapers]][[category:Women]]