LABOR & YERBA BUENA CENTER - Revision history

Ccarlsson: added Ted Kurihara photo

2024-02-26T04:52:37Z

added Ted Kurihara photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 25 February 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:

	''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''		''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''

			[[Image:Mars-hotel-on-4th-and-Howard,-now-Metreon Ted-Kurihara-photo 0783-b-010-copy.jpg\|800px]]

			'''Mars Hotel at northwest corner of 4th and Howard, c. 1968.'''

			''Photo: © [https://tedkuriharaphotography.com/ Ted Kurihara]''

	[[Image:Yerba-Buena-cleared-aerial-003.jpg]]		[[Image:Yerba-Buena-cleared-aerial-003.jpg]]

Ccarlsson: added photo

2020-06-08T21:32:57Z

added photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 8 June 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:

	''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''		''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''

			[[Image:Yerba-Buena-cleared-aerial-003.jpg]]

			'''Yerba Buena cleared, early 1970s.'''

			''Photo: Tim Drescher''

	[[Image:Soma1%24sfmoma-and-ybg.jpg]]		[[Image:Soma1%24sfmoma-and-ybg.jpg]]

Ccarlsson: changed navigation to integrate page

2020-01-27T21:38:22Z

changed navigation to integrate page

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 27 January 2020
Line 85:		Line 85:
	[[Image:Tours-redev.gif\|link=TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\| Continue Redevelopment Tour]] [[TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\| Continue Redevelopment Tour]]		[[Image:Tours-redev.gif\|link=TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\| Continue Redevelopment Tour]] [[TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\| Continue Redevelopment Tour]]

	[[Sixth Street (Part Three)\|Prev. Document]] [[~~1906 FIRE AND AFTERMATH~~ \|Next Document]]		[[Sixth Street (Part Three)\|Prev. Document]] [[Yerba Buena Center: Redevelopment and a Working Class Community’s Resistance\|Next Document]]

	[[category:SOMA]] [[category:redevelopment]] [[category:1960s]] [[category:1970s]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Labor]]		[[category:SOMA]] [[category:redevelopment]] [[category:1960s]] [[category:1970s]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Labor]]

Ccarlsson: added link

2020-01-27T21:30:12Z

added link

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 27 January 2020
Line 75:		Line 75:
	Along with the construction trades, the Bartender and Culinary Workers and Cooks unions, who had much to gain from more hotel and entertainment facilities, joined the chorus of YBC supporters. The [[Harry Bridges Memorial Building\|ILWU]]'s strong support of the project is at least partially explainable by the union's concerns for its future. The ILWU has a historic reputation as one of the most progressive unions in the country, having readily taken such stands as supporting the civil rights movement and opposing the Vietnam War. With growing [[Mechanization on the Waterfront\|mechanization]] of the West Coast docks, the ILWU was forced to face the prospect of slowly dying or merging with a larger union, such as the International Longshoremen's Association, dominant on East Coast and Gulf docks, or the Teamsters, who were handling increasing quantities of containerized cargo. ILWU leadership therefore saw it in their best interest to generate more jobs by backing business and political forces determined to advance San Francisco and the Bay Area as a service and trading hub for the Pacific Rim. As union membership declined, the old guard in leadership moved to protect its position by becoming a direct participant in the city's political machine, and thus consolidated its power around the union's steadily employed members.		Along with the construction trades, the Bartender and Culinary Workers and Cooks unions, who had much to gain from more hotel and entertainment facilities, joined the chorus of YBC supporters. The [[Harry Bridges Memorial Building\|ILWU]]'s strong support of the project is at least partially explainable by the union's concerns for its future. The ILWU has a historic reputation as one of the most progressive unions in the country, having readily taken such stands as supporting the civil rights movement and opposing the Vietnam War. With growing [[Mechanization on the Waterfront\|mechanization]] of the West Coast docks, the ILWU was forced to face the prospect of slowly dying or merging with a larger union, such as the International Longshoremen's Association, dominant on East Coast and Gulf docks, or the Teamsters, who were handling increasing quantities of containerized cargo. ILWU leadership therefore saw it in their best interest to generate more jobs by backing business and political forces determined to advance San Francisco and the Bay Area as a service and trading hub for the Pacific Rim. As union membership declined, the old guard in leadership moved to protect its position by becoming a direct participant in the city's political machine, and thus consolidated its power around the union's steadily employed members.

	Labor support for clearance in South of Market was not without its irony. Many of the area's retired residents had once been active union members, organizers, and even officials, and were supplementing their Social Security with union pensions. Yet the union leaders were insensitive to the plight of the older men, classifying them as "winos and bums." As one union leader put it: "They poor-mouth a lot, but under our system the residents can't remain. A few can't hold up progress."		Labor support for clearance in South of Market was [[Yerba Buena Center: Redevelopment and a Working Class Community’s Resistance\|not without its irony]]. Many of the area's retired residents had once been active union members, organizers, and even officials, and were supplementing their Social Security with union pensions. Yet the union leaders were insensitive to the plight of the older men, classifying them as "winos and bums." As one union leader put it: "They poor-mouth a lot, but under our system the residents can't remain. A few can't hold up progress."

	But more than a few were doing their best to hold up "progress." The South of Market residents were to form an organization called Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment ([[TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\|TOOR]]) to fight for their rights in the face of the displacement threat. Organized labor's break with its former constituency and membership, and its new ties to the Alioto administration and its downtown growth policies, led it to go so far as to file a "friend of the court" brief defending the Redevelopment Agency against charges of inadequate relocation brought in federal court by the South of Market residents.		But more than a few were doing their best to hold up "progress." The South of Market residents were to form an organization called Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment ([[TOOR (Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment)\|TOOR]]) to fight for their rights in the face of the displacement threat. Organized labor's break with its former constituency and membership, and its new ties to the Alioto administration and its downtown growth policies, led it to go so far as to file a "friend of the court" brief defending the Redevelopment Agency against charges of inadequate relocation brought in federal court by the South of Market residents.

Ccarlsson: added abstract

2019-05-15T22:44:15Z

added abstract

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 15 May 2019
Line 20:		Line 20:

	''Photo: Chris Carlsson''		''Photo: Chris Carlsson''

			{\| style="color: black; background-color: #F5DA81;"
			\| colspan="2" \|'''Although initially opposed to the building of the Yerba Buena Center, beginning with the election of Joe Alioto in 1967, labor became a strong proponent of redevelopment in the central district of San Francisco. Labor leaders, especially those of the ILWU and the Building Trades increasingly backed redevelopment for their own economic future even at the cost of replacing older members, as they saw the transformation of San Francisco from a blue-collar industrial city to a white-collar administrative center as inevitable.'''
			\|}

	Organized labor's strong backing of [[Mayor Joe Alioto\|Joe Alioto]] in 1967, followed by its strong backing for Yerba Buena Center, was a dramatic reversal of its original stance toward the project. Businesses in the South of Market area were highly unionized, and when redevelopment plans first came to light, the San Francisco Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, opposed them on the basis that the development would displace thousands of blue-collar jobs and replace them with nonunion clerical and service workers.		Organized labor's strong backing of [[Mayor Joe Alioto\|Joe Alioto]] in 1967, followed by its strong backing for Yerba Buena Center, was a dramatic reversal of its original stance toward the project. Businesses in the South of Market area were highly unionized, and when redevelopment plans first came to light, the San Francisco Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, opposed them on the basis that the development would displace thousands of blue-collar jobs and replace them with nonunion clerical and service workers.

Ccarlsson: added blockquote and fixed formatting

2019-05-02T19:54:30Z

added blockquote and fixed formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 2 May 2019
Line 63:		Line 63:
	A critic put it this way: "The unions are an arm of the downtown establishment, playing pretty much of an establishment game. They stand by while business dictates the course of San Francisco and, as long as they get theirs, they don't rock the boat."		A critic put it this way: "The unions are an arm of the downtown establishment, playing pretty much of an establishment game. They stand by while business dictates the course of San Francisco and, as long as they get theirs, they don't rock the boat."

	[[Image:Garbage-strewn-alley-in-SOMA-1976.jpg\|400px\|thumb\|right]		[[Image:Garbage-strewn-alley-in-SOMA-1976.jpg\|400px\|thumb\|right]]

	'''Typical South of Market alley, 1976.'''		'''Typical South of Market alley, 1976.'''

Ccarlsson: added blockquote and fixed formatting

2019-05-02T19:53:39Z

added blockquote and fixed formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 2 May 2019
Line 27:		Line 27:
	In the November 3, 1965, ''Official Bulletin of the San Francisco Labor Council'', Secretary-Treasurer George Johns took a broad look at the YBC project, the Redevelopment Agency, and the interests served by urban renewal in San Francisco, It was the first truly incisive public critique of this downtown development:		In the November 3, 1965, ''Official Bulletin of the San Francisco Labor Council'', Secretary-Treasurer George Johns took a broad look at the YBC project, the Redevelopment Agency, and the interests served by urban renewal in San Francisco, It was the first truly incisive public critique of this downtown development:

	''"Speculative real estate operators ... seem to have taken over the planning functions of our City ... Convention halls and sports arenas have their place. But the loss of millions of square feet of industrial space can only extend unemployment, suffering and poverty ... A redevelopment program is certainly needed there [South of Market]. However . . . a rehabilitation and conservation program makes far better sense than the program of massive clearance....''		<blockquote>''"Speculative real estate operators ... seem to have taken over the planning functions of our City ... Convention halls and sports arenas have their place. But the loss of millions of square feet of industrial space can only extend unemployment, suffering and poverty ... A redevelopment program is certainly needed there [South of Market]. However . . . a rehabilitation and conservation program makes far better sense than the program of massive clearance....''

	''Certain politically important persons consider the clearance program in Yerba Buena as the beginning of the redevelopment of 1100 industrially zoned acres South of Market. With the support and blessings of the [Redevelopment] agency, they are ready to kick industry out of San Francisco....''		''Certain politically important persons consider the clearance program in Yerba Buena as the beginning of the redevelopment of 1100 industrially zoned acres South of Market. With the support and blessings of the [Redevelopment] agency, they are ready to kick industry out of San Francisco....''
Line 35:		Line 35:
	''Yet citizens who oppose a policy of rezoning light industry right out of the City are considered "obstructionists." Obstructionism, in fact, has generally become a dirty word for anyone bucking the policies of the redevelopment agency. But isn't it the agency that is really obstructing? Aren't they obstructing efforts to retain industry and therefore jobs in San Francisco by moving away from the preservation and expansion of industrial zoning that is so necessary if we are to maintain the economic balance of this City and the continuance of job opportunities?''		''Yet citizens who oppose a policy of rezoning light industry right out of the City are considered "obstructionists." Obstructionism, in fact, has generally become a dirty word for anyone bucking the policies of the redevelopment agency. But isn't it the agency that is really obstructing? Aren't they obstructing efforts to retain industry and therefore jobs in San Francisco by moving away from the preservation and expansion of industrial zoning that is so necessary if we are to maintain the economic balance of this City and the continuance of job opportunities?''

	''What they are not obstructing are the special interests of certain groups. The Agency and Mr. Herman must be reminded of their obligations to the rest of the citizens of San Francisco. The Yerba Buena issue is a good place to start."''		''What they are not obstructing are the special interests of certain groups. The Agency and Mr. Herman must be reminded of their obligations to the rest of the citizens of San Francisco. The Yerba Buena issue is a good place to start."''</blockquote>

	But as time passed, and the various pieces began falling into place, pressures began building within labor ranks and from outside for a reversal of labor's position on YBC. The politics of the Alioto campaign and election was one major element in the switch. Justin Herman and other SFRA representatives courted labor leaders, trying to convince them that the loss of blue-collar jobs and the transformation of the city into a white-collar administrative center was inevitable, and that labor could reap certain gains from this process. In a short time the conversion was complete.		But as time passed, and the various pieces began falling into place, pressures began building within labor ranks and from outside for a reversal of labor's position on YBC. The politics of the Alioto campaign and election was one major element in the switch. Justin Herman and other SFRA representatives courted labor leaders, trying to convince them that the loss of blue-collar jobs and the transformation of the city into a white-collar administrative center was inevitable, and that labor could reap certain gains from this process. In a short time the conversion was complete.
Line 63:		Line 63:
	A critic put it this way: "The unions are an arm of the downtown establishment, playing pretty much of an establishment game. They stand by while business dictates the course of San Francisco and, as long as they get theirs, they don't rock the boat."		A critic put it this way: "The unions are an arm of the downtown establishment, playing pretty much of an establishment game. They stand by while business dictates the course of San Francisco and, as long as they get theirs, they don't rock the boat."

	[[Image:Garbage-strewn-alley-in-SOMA-1976.jpg\|400px\|thumb\|~~left\|~~Typical South of Market alley, 1976. Photo by Francisco FloresLanda]] Along with the construction trades, the Bartender and Culinary Workers and Cooks unions, who had much to gain from more hotel and entertainment facilities, joined the chorus of YBC supporters. The [[Harry Bridges Memorial Building\|ILWU]]'s strong support of the project is at least partially explainable by the union's concerns for its future. The ILWU has a historic reputation as one of the most progressive unions in the country, having readily taken such stands as supporting the civil rights movement and opposing the Vietnam War. With growing [[Mechanization on the Waterfront\|mechanization]] of the West Coast docks, the ILWU was forced to face the prospect of slowly dying or merging with a larger union, such as the International Longshoremen's Association, dominant on East Coast and Gulf docks, or the Teamsters, who were handling increasing quantities of containerized cargo. ILWU leadership therefore saw it in their best interest to generate more jobs by backing business and political forces determined to advance San Francisco and the Bay Area as a service and trading hub for the Pacific Rim. As union membership declined, the old guard in leadership moved to protect its position by becoming a direct participant in the city's political machine, and thus consolidated its power around the union's steadily employed members.		[[Image:Garbage-strewn-alley-in-SOMA-1976.jpg\|400px\|thumb\|right]

			'''Typical South of Market alley, 1976.'''

			''Photo by Francisco FloresLanda''

			Along with the construction trades, the Bartender and Culinary Workers and Cooks unions, who had much to gain from more hotel and entertainment facilities, joined the chorus of YBC supporters. The [[Harry Bridges Memorial Building\|ILWU]]'s strong support of the project is at least partially explainable by the union's concerns for its future. The ILWU has a historic reputation as one of the most progressive unions in the country, having readily taken such stands as supporting the civil rights movement and opposing the Vietnam War. With growing [[Mechanization on the Waterfront\|mechanization]] of the West Coast docks, the ILWU was forced to face the prospect of slowly dying or merging with a larger union, such as the International Longshoremen's Association, dominant on East Coast and Gulf docks, or the Teamsters, who were handling increasing quantities of containerized cargo. ILWU leadership therefore saw it in their best interest to generate more jobs by backing business and political forces determined to advance San Francisco and the Bay Area as a service and trading hub for the Pacific Rim. As union membership declined, the old guard in leadership moved to protect its position by becoming a direct participant in the city's political machine, and thus consolidated its power around the union's steadily employed members.

	Labor support for clearance in South of Market was not without its irony. Many of the area's retired residents had once been active union members, organizers, and even officials, and were supplementing their Social Security with union pensions. Yet the union leaders were insensitive to the plight of the older men, classifying them as "winos and bums." As one union leader put it: "They poor-mouth a lot, but under our system the residents can't remain. A few can't hold up progress."		Labor support for clearance in South of Market was not without its irony. Many of the area's retired residents had once been active union members, organizers, and even officials, and were supplementing their Social Security with union pensions. Yet the union leaders were insensitive to the plight of the older men, classifying them as "winos and bums." As one union leader put it: "They poor-mouth a lot, but under our system the residents can't remain. A few can't hold up progress."

Lisaruth: Johns's quoted section was only partially italicized, made the rest so

2014-03-21T06:53:36Z

Johns's quoted section was only partially italicized, made the rest so

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 20 March 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:
	''"Speculative real estate operators ... seem to have taken over the planning functions of our City ... Convention halls and sports arenas have their place. But the loss of millions of square feet of industrial space can only extend unemployment, suffering and poverty ... A redevelopment program is certainly needed there [South of Market]. However . . . a rehabilitation and conservation program makes far better sense than the program of massive clearance....''		''"Speculative real estate operators ... seem to have taken over the planning functions of our City ... Convention halls and sports arenas have their place. But the loss of millions of square feet of industrial space can only extend unemployment, suffering and poverty ... A redevelopment program is certainly needed there [South of Market]. However . . . a rehabilitation and conservation program makes far better sense than the program of massive clearance....''

	Certain politically important persons consider the clearance program in Yerba Buena as the beginning of the redevelopment of 1100 industrially zoned acres South of Market. With the support and blessings of the [Redevelopment] agency, they are ready to kick industry out of San Francisco....		''Certain politically important persons consider the clearance program in Yerba Buena as the beginning of the redevelopment of 1100 industrially zoned acres South of Market. With the support and blessings of the [Redevelopment] agency, they are ready to kick industry out of San Francisco....''

	In addition to the many workers who will lose their jobs, we wonder if the policy makers of this City have thought of the social and economic effect on over 3,000 single persons, a third of them aged, who will be displaced in the area without realistic provision for relocation. Displacement can mean higher rent and out of the way locations. The hardship such conditions will impose on senior citizens is obvious enough to anyone still sensitive to human needs. . . .		''In addition to the many workers who will lose their jobs, we wonder if the policy makers of this City have thought of the social and economic effect on over 3,000 single persons, a third of them aged, who will be displaced in the area without realistic provision for relocation. Displacement can mean higher rent and out of the way locations. The hardship such conditions will impose on senior citizens is obvious enough to anyone still sensitive to human needs. . . .''

	Yet citizens who oppose a policy of rezoning light industry right out of the City are considered "obstructionists." Obstructionism, in fact, has generally become a dirty word for anyone bucking the policies of the redevelopment agency. But isn't it the agency that is really obstructing? Aren't they obstructing efforts to retain industry and therefore jobs in San Francisco by moving away from the preservation and expansion of industrial zoning that is so necessary if we are to maintain the economic balance of this City and the continuance of job opportunities?		''Yet citizens who oppose a policy of rezoning light industry right out of the City are considered "obstructionists." Obstructionism, in fact, has generally become a dirty word for anyone bucking the policies of the redevelopment agency. But isn't it the agency that is really obstructing? Aren't they obstructing efforts to retain industry and therefore jobs in San Francisco by moving away from the preservation and expansion of industrial zoning that is so necessary if we are to maintain the economic balance of this City and the continuance of job opportunities?''

	What they are not obstructing are the special interests of certain groups. The Agency and Mr. Herman must be reminded of their obligations to the rest of the citizens of San Francisco. The Yerba Buena issue is a good place to start."		''What they are not obstructing are the special interests of certain groups. The Agency and Mr. Herman must be reminded of their obligations to the rest of the citizens of San Francisco. The Yerba Buena issue is a good place to start."''

	But as time passed, and the various pieces began falling into place, pressures began building within labor ranks and from outside for a reversal of labor's position on YBC. The politics of the Alioto campaign and election was one major element in the switch. Justin Herman and other SFRA representatives courted labor leaders, trying to convince them that the loss of blue-collar jobs and the transformation of the city into a white-collar administrative center was inevitable, and that labor could reap certain gains from this process. In a short time the conversion was complete.		But as time passed, and the various pieces began falling into place, pressures began building within labor ranks and from outside for a reversal of labor's position on YBC. The politics of the Alioto campaign and election was one major element in the switch. Justin Herman and other SFRA representatives courted labor leaders, trying to convince them that the loss of blue-collar jobs and the transformation of the city into a white-collar administrative center was inevitable, and that labor could reap certain gains from this process. In a short time the conversion was complete.

Ccarlsson at 00:36, 1 October 2013

2013-10-01T00:36:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 30 September 2013
Line 50:		Line 50:

	''Photo: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveglass/ Dave Glass]''		''Photo: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveglass/ Dave Glass]''

			[[Image:1977 view of YBG lots AAC-0727.jpg]]

			'''Looking northeast from apx. 4th and Folsom, 1977.'''

			''Photo: San Francisco History Center, SF Public Library''

	Within the Labor Council, it was the Building and Construction Trades Council (BCTC) that carried the day for YBC. The conversion of downtown San Francisco into the administrative and financial headquarters of the West--particularly through the massive [[BART: Bechtel's Baby\|Bay Area Rapid Transit System]] and the [[Produce Market\|Golden Gateway project]]--had been good for the various trades and locals in the construction industry. By the mid-1960s the BCTC was a backer not just of Yerba Buena Center, but of any planned construction which would provide employment for members of its affiliated unions. This included the proposed 550-foot U.S. Steel highrise on the waterfront and a proposed freeway through Golden Gate Park, both of which earned the hostility of the general populace because of the loss of recreational space and scenic views. But as a representative of the BCTC said regarding Yerba Buena Center, "We are in favor of building with no respect to where it is and how it is."34 For many San Francisco workers the quest for construction jobs was vital to survival. The redevelopment master plan for the city was displacing thousands of jobs, and it was not likely that unemployed bluecollar workers would find employment in white-collar jobs.		Within the Labor Council, it was the Building and Construction Trades Council (BCTC) that carried the day for YBC. The conversion of downtown San Francisco into the administrative and financial headquarters of the West--particularly through the massive [[BART: Bechtel's Baby\|Bay Area Rapid Transit System]] and the [[Produce Market\|Golden Gateway project]]--had been good for the various trades and locals in the construction industry. By the mid-1960s the BCTC was a backer not just of Yerba Buena Center, but of any planned construction which would provide employment for members of its affiliated unions. This included the proposed 550-foot U.S. Steel highrise on the waterfront and a proposed freeway through Golden Gate Park, both of which earned the hostility of the general populace because of the loss of recreational space and scenic views. But as a representative of the BCTC said regarding Yerba Buena Center, "We are in favor of building with no respect to where it is and how it is."34 For many San Francisco workers the quest for construction jobs was vital to survival. The redevelopment master plan for the city was displacing thousands of jobs, and it was not likely that unemployed bluecollar workers would find employment in white-collar jobs.

Ccarlsson: added Dave Glass photo

2013-06-28T20:31:42Z

added Dave Glass photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 28 June 2013
Line 44:		Line 44:

	''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''		''Photo: Francisco FloresLanda''

			[[Image:1984 4th and Mission before Marriott and YBC 3336213179 c362128b4e o d.jpg\|720px\|thumb]]

			'''Photo looking east from 4th and Mission, 1984.'''

			''Photo: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveglass/ Dave Glass]''

	Within the Labor Council, it was the Building and Construction Trades Council (BCTC) that carried the day for YBC. The conversion of downtown San Francisco into the administrative and financial headquarters of the West--particularly through the massive [[BART: Bechtel's Baby\|Bay Area Rapid Transit System]] and the [[Produce Market\|Golden Gateway project]]--had been good for the various trades and locals in the construction industry. By the mid-1960s the BCTC was a backer not just of Yerba Buena Center, but of any planned construction which would provide employment for members of its affiliated unions. This included the proposed 550-foot U.S. Steel highrise on the waterfront and a proposed freeway through Golden Gate Park, both of which earned the hostility of the general populace because of the loss of recreational space and scenic views. But as a representative of the BCTC said regarding Yerba Buena Center, "We are in favor of building with no respect to where it is and how it is."34 For many San Francisco workers the quest for construction jobs was vital to survival. The redevelopment master plan for the city was displacing thousands of jobs, and it was not likely that unemployed bluecollar workers would find employment in white-collar jobs.		Within the Labor Council, it was the Building and Construction Trades Council (BCTC) that carried the day for YBC. The conversion of downtown San Francisco into the administrative and financial headquarters of the West--particularly through the massive [[BART: Bechtel's Baby\|Bay Area Rapid Transit System]] and the [[Produce Market\|Golden Gateway project]]--had been good for the various trades and locals in the construction industry. By the mid-1960s the BCTC was a backer not just of Yerba Buena Center, but of any planned construction which would provide employment for members of its affiliated unions. This included the proposed 550-foot U.S. Steel highrise on the waterfront and a proposed freeway through Golden Gate Park, both of which earned the hostility of the general populace because of the loss of recreational space and scenic views. But as a representative of the BCTC said regarding Yerba Buena Center, "We are in favor of building with no respect to where it is and how it is."34 For many San Francisco workers the quest for construction jobs was vital to survival. The redevelopment master plan for the city was displacing thousands of jobs, and it was not likely that unemployed bluecollar workers would find employment in white-collar jobs.