Employers' Association - Revision history

Ccarlsson: added table of Employers' Association members

2017-06-16T02:36:57Z

added table of Employers' Association members

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 15 June 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:

	The Employers' Association would neither negotiate directly with the unions or reveal who their constituent members were. The businesses were likely to suffer a boycott if the labor-sympathetic public found out what businesses constituted the organization. Any information on the faceless entity was generally dredged up by the ''San Francisco Examiner'''s staff of high-paid muckrakers. According to the ''Examiner'', the Association's more active members included Cahn & Nickelburg, John Rapp & Son, Levi Strauss and Neustadter Bros, and the Emporium.		The Employers' Association would neither negotiate directly with the unions or reveal who their constituent members were. The businesses were likely to suffer a boycott if the labor-sympathetic public found out what businesses constituted the organization. Any information on the faceless entity was generally dredged up by the ''San Francisco Examiner'''s staff of high-paid muckrakers. According to the ''Examiner'', the Association's more active members included Cahn & Nickelburg, John Rapp & Son, Levi Strauss and Neustadter Bros, and the Emporium.

			{\| class="wikitable"
			\|+'''Table 11-1: Executive Committee of the Employers’ Association, Summer, 1901'''<br>
			''(The San Francisco Examiner, July 30, 1901:2; August 7, 1901 :3)''
			\|-
			\|'''Member
			\|'''Corporate Connection'''
			\|-
			\|Frederick W. Dohrmann Jr.
			\|Secretary, Nathan, Dohrmann Company<br>
			\|-
			\|A.A. Watkins
			\|Vice President, W.W. Montague & Company; President San Francisco Board of Trade<br>
			\|-
			\|Charles Holbrook
			\|President, Holbrook, Merrill & Stetson; a director of United Railroads, San Francisco, Union Trust Company and the Mutual Savings Bank<br>
			\|-
			\|Harvey D. Loveland
			\|Vice President, Tillmann & Bendel<br>
			\|-
			\|F.W. von Sicklen
			\|Dodge, Sweeney and Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Percy T. Morgan
			\|President, California Wine Association; a director of California Fruit Canners Association<br>
			\|-
			\|Isaac Upham
			\|Payot, Upham and Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Frank J. Symmes
			\|President, Thomas Day Company, President of the Merchants Association; a director of Spring Valley Water Company and Central Trust Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Edward M. Herrick
			\|President, Pacific Pine Company and Grey’s Harbor Commercial Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Akin H. Vail
			\|Sanborn, Vail and Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Joseph D. Grant
			\|Murphy, Grant & Company, a director of Donohoe-Kelly Banking Company, Mercantile National Bank, Mercantile Trust Company and Natomas Consolidated<br>
			\|-
			\|Jacob Stern
			\|First Vice President of Levi Strauss & Company, a director of the Bank of California, Union Trust Company and North Alaska Salmon<br>
			\|-
			\|S. Nickelsburg
			\|President, Cohn, Nickelsburg & Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Adolph Mack
			\|Mack & Company. Also a director of City Electric Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Andrew Carrigan
			\|Vice President, Denham, Carrigan & Hayden Company<br>
			\|-
			\|Henry D. Morton
			\|Morton Brothers<br>
			\|-
			\|J. S. Dinkelspiel
			\|J.S. Dinkelspiel & Company<br>
			\|-
			\|George D. Cooper
			\|W. and J. Sloane & Company<br>
			\|-
			\|}

	In late July, 1901, sailors, longshoremen and marine firemen went on strike as well, effectively shutting down the San Francisco harbor. The Employers' Association desperately began searching for strikebreakers, bringing in workers from the interior of the United States as well as hiring Navy men returning from the Philippines. Mayor James Phelan played intermediary, being the only party the Association would talk to. Unfortunately, the demands of both sides were somewhat hazy; it seemed resolution was all but impossible. Meanwhile some 200 ships had piled up in San Francisco harbor. The Chamber of Commerce and the Merchants' Association offered support to the Employers' Association, and the city began protecting strikebreakers from union harassment.		In late July, 1901, sailors, longshoremen and marine firemen went on strike as well, effectively shutting down the San Francisco harbor. The Employers' Association desperately began searching for strikebreakers, bringing in workers from the interior of the United States as well as hiring Navy men returning from the Philippines. Mayor James Phelan played intermediary, being the only party the Association would talk to. Unfortunately, the demands of both sides were somewhat hazy; it seemed resolution was all but impossible. Meanwhile some 200 ships had piled up in San Francisco harbor. The Chamber of Commerce and the Merchants' Association offered support to the Employers' Association, and the city began protecting strikebreakers from union harassment.

Ccarlsson: added audio

2009-06-02T06:00:11Z

added audio

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 1 June 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	''''San Francisco History Center, SF Public Library''		''''San Francisco History Center, SF Public Library''

			<div>
			<flashmp3>http://www.archive.org/download/EmployersAssociation/Talbot_employersAssn.mp3</flashmp3>
			</div>

			''Brief dramatization of Employers' Association by Haight Ashbury Community Radio Project, 1980.''

	In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the [[1901 Labor War\|City Front Federation]] -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.		In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the [[1901 Labor War\|City Front Federation]] -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.

Ccarlsson: Protected "Employers' Association": finished essay [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2009-01-17T08:31:25Z

Protected "Employers' Association": finished essay [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:31, 17 January 2009
(No difference)

Ccarlsson: PC and protected

2009-01-17T08:31:09Z

PC and protected

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 17 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''<font face = Papyrus> <font color = maroon> <font size = 4>Historical Essay</font></font> </font>'''

			''by Ben Ratliff''

	[[Image:rulclas1$donohue-memorial-1904.jpg]]		[[Image:rulclas1$donohue-memorial-1904.jpg]]

	'''Memorial to Peter Donohue, founder of the Union Iron Works, installed at Battery and Market, shown here in 1904.'''		'''Memorial to Peter Donohue, founder of the Union Iron Works, installed at Battery and Market, shown here in 1904.'''

	''''San Francisco History ~~Room~~, SF Public Library''		''''San Francisco History Center, SF Public Library''

	In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the [[1901 Labor War\|City Front Federation]] -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.		In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the [[1901 Labor War\|City Front Federation]] -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.
Line 25:		Line 29:
	In the end, neither labor nor capital was the clear victor of the Strike of 1901, but the workers fared better. Union members returned to work, toiling alongside non-union members. The Employers' Association was rendered impotent and industrial relations became relatively harmonious again.		In the end, neither labor nor capital was the clear victor of the Strike of 1901, but the workers fared better. Union members returned to work, toiling alongside non-union members. The Employers' Association was rendered impotent and industrial relations became relatively harmonious again.

	~~''--Ben Ratliff ''~~

	(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, [http://www.questia.com/library/book/industrial-relations-in-the-san-francisco-bay-area-1900-1918-by-robert-edward-lee-knight.jsp''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918].)''		(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, [http://www.questia.com/library/book/industrial-relations-in-the-san-francisco-bay-area-1900-1918-by-robert-edward-lee-knight.jsp''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918].)''

Ccarlsson: link to book

2008-08-04T07:18:15Z

link to book

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 4 August 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:
	''--Ben Ratliff ''		''--Ben Ratliff ''

	(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, ''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918.)''		(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, [http://www.questia.com/library/book/industrial-relations-in-the-san-francisco-bay-area-1900-1918-by-robert-edward-lee-knight.jsp''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918].)''

	[[The Gold Rush Financiers: Pioche and Robinson \|Prev. Document]] [[Citizens' Alliance \|Next Document]]		[[The Gold Rush Financiers: Pioche and Robinson \|Prev. Document]] [[Citizens' Alliance \|Next Document]]

	[[category:Power and Money]] [[category:1900s]] [[category:Labor]] [[category:downtown]]		[[category:Power and Money]] [[category:1900s]] [[category:Labor]] [[category:downtown]]

Ccarlsson: categories and links

2008-08-04T07:15:56Z

categories and links

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 4 August 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Memorial to Peter Donohue, founder of the Union Iron Works, installed at Battery and Market, shown here in 1904.'''		'''Memorial to Peter Donohue, founder of the Union Iron Works, installed at Battery and Market, shown here in 1904.'''

	~~In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors~~' ~~Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen~~'~~s Union and the Teamsters~~' ~~Local Union 85 united to form the City Front Federation -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down~~ San Francisco ~~if it called for a strike. In response~~, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.		''''San Francisco History Room, SF Public Library''

	The nascent ~~mployers~~' Association got a chance to flex some muscle when a small metal polishers' union went on strike in April, 1901, demanding an eight-hour work day.		In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the [[1901 Labor War\|City Front Federation]] -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.

			The nascent employers' Association got a chance to flex some muscle when a small metal polishers' union went on strike in April, 1901, demanding an eight-hour work day.

	The shops were initially willing to concede to the metal polishers' demands, but the Employers' Association, backed by somewhere between $350,000 and $500,000 in anonymous donations, put pressure on the shops not to give in. The action of the Employers' Association set a precedent that would be followed by other employer associations thereafter. More and more businesses were pressured into deferring to the desires of the Employers' Association or they would be ostracized from the big players in the business community who put the teeth into the Association.		The shops were initially willing to concede to the metal polishers' demands, but the Employers' Association, backed by somewhere between $350,000 and $500,000 in anonymous donations, put pressure on the shops not to give in. The action of the Employers' Association set a precedent that would be followed by other employer associations thereafter. More and more businesses were pressured into deferring to the desires of the Employers' Association or they would be ostracized from the big players in the business community who put the teeth into the Association.
Line 27:		Line 29:
	(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, ''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918.)''		(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, ''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918.)''

	~~Contributors to this page include~~:		[[The Gold Rush Financiers: Pioche and Robinson \|Prev. Document]] [[Citizens' Alliance \|Next Document]]

	'~~'San Francisco Public Library,San Francisco,CA - Publisher or Photographer ''~~

	~~Ratliff,Ben - Writer~~

	[[~~The Gold Rush Financiers~~: ~~Pioche~~ and ~~Robinson \|Prev. Document~~]] [[~~Citizens' Alliance \|Next Document~~]]		[[category:Power and Money]] [[category:1900s]] [[category:Labor]] [[category:downtown]]

Admin: 1 revision(s)

2007-10-07T22:15:38Z

1 revision(s)

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:15, 7 October 2007
(No difference)

Unknown user at 00:00, 15 January 2001

2001-01-15T00:00:00Z

New page

[[Image:rulclas1$donohue-memorial-1904.jpg]]

'''Memorial to Peter Donohue, founder of the Union Iron Works, installed at Battery and Market, shown here in 1904.'''

In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century, the formation of labor and business associations became more common and accepted in the general public. In February of 1901, the Sailors' Union of the Pacific, the longshoremen's Union and the Teamsters' Local Union 85 united to form the City Front Federation -- a significant block of the working class that could effectively shut down San Francisco if it called for a strike. In response, fifty or so San Francisco businesses got together two months later with the objective of making San Francisco an open-shop city. Thus the potential arose for a significant conflict between capital and labor.

The nascent mployers' Association got a chance to flex some muscle when a small metal polishers' union went on strike in April, 1901, demanding an eight-hour work day.

The shops were initially willing to concede to the metal polishers' demands, but the Employers' Association, backed by somewhere between $350,000 and $500,000 in anonymous donations, put pressure on the shops not to give in. The action of the Employers' Association set a precedent that would be followed by other employer associations thereafter. More and more businesses were pressured into deferring to the desires of the Employers' Association or they would be ostracized from the big players in the business community who put the teeth into the Association.

On May 1st of 1901, typically a time of much labor agitation in San Francisco, the Cooks' and Waiters' Union struck, demanding one day of rest per week, a ten-hour work day and a union shop for all restaurants in the city. The Carriage Makers' Union went on strike as well. The Carriage Makers' Association originally agreed to meet the demands of the union, but recanted when the Employers' Association threatened to cut off supplies. Essentially, it got caught in the middle.

As the strike continued, there was much agitation in the working class, and the bakers' union went on sympathy strike to show solidarity with the cooks' and waiters' unions. The International Machinists' Union, which had intended to strike on Mayday but didn't quite have its act together, initiated a nationwide strike on May 20, which added 4,000 to 5,000 more men to 2,000 already on strike in San Francisco. The National Metal Trades' Association decided to play hard-ball with the union at the national level, which set the stage for a prolonged confrontation.

In spite of a settlement between the Carriage Makers' Union and Carriage Makers' Association (forced by the Teamsters), the seeds of a significant capital-labor conflict had been planted. The stakes rose when the Epworth League had its meeting in San Francisco and the Teamsters refused to let their members handle baggage. The Draymen's Association, under pressure from the Employers' Association, systematically locked out their workers when they refused to move the bags. In response, the Teamsters called for a total walk-out by their members.

The Employers' Association would neither negotiate directly with the unions or reveal who their constituent members were. The businesses were likely to suffer a boycott if the labor-sympathetic public found out what businesses constituted the organization. Any information on the faceless entity was generally dredged up by the ''San Francisco Examiner'''s staff of high-paid muckrakers. According to the ''Examiner'', the Association's more active members included Cahn & Nickelburg, John Rapp & Son, Levi Strauss and Neustadter Bros, and the Emporium.

In late July, 1901, sailors, longshoremen and marine firemen went on strike as well, effectively shutting down the San Francisco harbor. The Employers' Association desperately began searching for strikebreakers, bringing in workers from the interior of the United States as well as hiring Navy men returning from the Philippines. Mayor James Phelan played intermediary, being the only party the Association would talk to. Unfortunately, the demands of both sides were somewhat hazy; it seemed resolution was all but impossible. Meanwhile some 200 ships had piled up in San Francisco harbor. The Chamber of Commerce and the Merchants' Association offered support to the Employers' Association, and the city began protecting strikebreakers from union harassment.

Ultimately, California Governor Gage was forced to intercede to resolve the conflict. None too pleased with the conduct of the Employers' Association, Governor Gage merely threatened to put San Francisco under martial law until an agreement was reached. The conflict was resolved immediately.

In the end, neither labor nor capital was the clear victor of the Strike of 1901, but the workers fared better. Union members returned to work, toiling alongside non-union members. The Employers' Association was rendered impotent and industrial relations became relatively harmonious again.

''--Ben Ratliff ''

(* Information garnered largely from Edward Lee Knight, ''Industrial Relations in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1900-1918.)''

Contributors to this page include:

''San Francisco Public Library,San Francisco,CA - Publisher or Photographer ''

Ratliff,Ben - Writer

[[The Gold Rush Financiers: Pioche and Robinson |Prev. Document]] [[Citizens' Alliance |Next Document]]