Abalone Alliance Staffer Leaves - Revision history

Ccarlsson: fixing video with new iframe format

2012-07-13T05:16:13Z

fixing video with new iframe format

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 12 July 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.		The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

	~~{{#ev~~:archive\|SusanSwiftOnAntinuclearPoliticsAndOrganizedLabor\|640}}		<iframe src="http://archive.org/embed/SusanSwiftOnAntinuclearPoliticsAndOrganizedLabor" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0"></iframe>


	'''Susan Swift in 2011, speaking about her frustrations as an Abalone Alliance staffer in trying to build alliances with organized labor and folks outside of the anti-nuclear culture.'''		'''Susan Swift in 2011, speaking about her frustrations as an Abalone Alliance staffer in trying to build alliances with organized labor and folks outside of the anti-nuclear culture.'''

Ccarlsson: trying new upload link

2012-05-30T22:14:39Z

trying new upload link

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 30 May 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.		The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

	{{#ev:archive\|~~SusanSwiftOnAnti-nuclearPoliticsorganizedLaborAndTactics~~\|640}}		{{#ev:archive\|SusanSwiftOnAntinuclearPoliticsAndOrganizedLabor\|640}}

Ccarlsson at 08:22, 30 May 2012

2012-05-30T08:22:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 30 May 2012
Line 38:		Line 38:
	''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''		''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''

	~~<iframe src="http://archive.org/embed/SusanSwiftOnAnti-nuclearPoliticsorganizedLaborAndTactics" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0"></iframe>~~

	<hr>		<hr>

Ccarlsson: changed video link to shorter clip

2012-05-30T08:21:38Z

changed video link to shorter clip

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 30 May 2012
Line 38:		Line 38:
	''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''		''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''

			<iframe src="http://archive.org/embed/SusanSwiftOnAnti-nuclearPoliticsorganizedLaborAndTactics" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0"></iframe>

	<hr>		<hr>

Ccarlsson: changed video link to shorter clip

2012-05-30T08:20:04Z

changed video link to shorter clip

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 30 May 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.		The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

	{{#ev:archive\|~~EcologyEmergesSusanSwift~~\|640}}		{{#ev:archive\|SusanSwiftOnAnti-nuclearPoliticsorganizedLaborAndTactics\|640}}


	'''~~One-hour long interview with~~ Susan Swift in 2011, ~~reflecting on years~~ of ~~ecological and social activism~~.'''		'''Susan Swift in 2011, speaking about her frustrations as an Abalone Alliance staffer in trying to build alliances with organized labor and folks outside of the anti-nuclear culture.'''

	''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''		''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''

Ccarlsson: added to anti-nuke tour

2012-02-18T06:32:36Z

added to anti-nuke tour

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 17 February 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:

	''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''		''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''


			<hr>

			[[Image:Foundsf-anti-nukes-icon.gif\|link=The Second Vandenberg Air Force Base Blockade, March 1983]] [[The Second Vandenberg Air Force Base Blockade, March 1983\| Continue Anti-Nuke Tour]]


	[[category:anti-nuclear]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Dissent]]		[[category:anti-nuclear]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Dissent]]

Ccarlsson at 06:38, 24 January 2012

2012-01-24T06:38:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 23 January 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.		The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

	~~<iframe src="http~~:~~//www.~~archive~~.org/embed/~~EcologyEmergesSusanSwift~~" width="~~640~~" height="480" frameborder="0"></iframe>~~		{{#ev:archive\|EcologyEmergesSusanSwift\|640}}


	'''One-hour long interview with Susan Swift in 2011, reflecting on years of ecological and social activism.'''		'''One-hour long interview with Susan Swift in 2011, reflecting on years of ecological and social activism.'''

Ccarlsson at 06:34, 24 January 2012

2012-01-24T06:34:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 23 January 2012
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.		The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

			<iframe src="http://www.archive.org/embed/EcologyEmergesSusanSwift" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0"></iframe>

			'''One-hour long interview with Susan Swift in 2011, reflecting on years of ecological and social activism.'''

			''Part of the "Ecology Emerges" project of Shaping San Francisco, interview conducted by Chris Carlsson, videography by Nick Kasimatis''

	[[category:anti-nuclear]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Dissent]]		[[category:anti-nuclear]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Dissent]]

Ccarlsson at 03:02, 24 January 2012

2012-01-24T03:02:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 23 January 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	''Originally published in "It's About Times," the Abalone Alliance newspaper, Sept.-Oct. 1982''		''Originally published in "It's About Times," the Abalone Alliance newspaper, Sept.-Oct. 1982''

	~~Dear IAT,~~		[[Image:Susan-swift-at-Gary-Conference-Dec-82Jan83.jpg]]

	~~I am leaving the Abalone Alliance after~~- ~~more than a year as a staffperson in the statewide office. As you may imagine~~, ~~the job was one of mixed rewards and frustrations~~.		'''Susan Swift speaks at Gary, Indiana anti-nuclear conference, 1982.'''

	Initially I was able to overlook the stress of the job because of a dedication to our goals, a ~~commit" ment~~ to the process and a feeling that I could contribute to communications within the Alliance and with the public.		''Photo: It's About Times newspaper''

			Dear ''It's About Times'',

			I am leaving the Abalone Alliance after more than a year as a staffperson in the statewide office. As you may imagine, the job was one of mixed rewards and frustrations.

			Initially I was able to overlook the stress of the job because of a dedication to our goals, a commitment to the process and a feeling that I could contribute to communications within the Alliance and with the public.

	But over time several political problems became evident. First, the staff receives little help with the work of statewide networking and resource exchange. Certainly such tasks can drain the energy of local groups and little can be done by geographically removed member groups.		But over time several political problems became evident. First, the staff receives little help with the work of statewide networking and resource exchange. Certainly such tasks can drain the energy of local groups and little can be done by geographically removed member groups.
Line 15:		Line 21:
	But this is no excuse for the low input of support and participation the staff receives. This lack of input is often an intentional avoidance of concrete political differences which people in the AA tend to suppress in favor of "non-violent harmony."		But this is no excuse for the low input of support and participation the staff receives. This lack of input is often an intentional avoidance of concrete political differences which people in the AA tend to suppress in favor of "non-violent harmony."

	Many issues .have arisen which required immediate attention, but in which the organization showed little interest. These included vital tasks like setting up budgets and conferences, reviewing the planning of the Financial District Action, etc. As a consequence the staff was forced to make decisions -- and later was criticized for acting out of process. But where are the task groups and collectives that should be doing this work?		Many issues have arisen which required immediate attention, but in which the organization showed little interest. These included vital tasks like setting up budgets and conferences, reviewing the planning of the Financial District Action, etc. As a consequence the staff was forced to make decisions -- and later was criticized for acting out of process. But where are the task groups and collectives that should be doing this work?

	It is a political embarrassment for me to associate with the AA at this time. We are an extraordinarily self-centered, white, middle-class group of moralists. Our lip service is in direct conflict with our activities.		It is a political embarrassment for me to associate with the AA at this time. We are an extraordinarily self-centered, white, middle-class group of moralists. Our lip service is in direct conflict with our activities.

Ccarlsson: Created page with '''' Primary Source ''' ''-- Susan Swift former AA staffperson'' ''Originally published in "It's A...'

2012-01-24T02:50:39Z

Created page with '''' Primary Source ''' ''-- Susan Swift former AA staffperson'' ''Originally published in "It's A...'

New page

''' Primary Source '''

''-- Susan Swift former AA staffperson''

''Originally published in "It's About Times," the Abalone Alliance newspaper, Sept.-Oct. 1982''

Dear IAT,

I am leaving the Abalone Alliance after- more than a year as a staffperson in the statewide office. As you may imagine, the job was one of mixed rewards and frustrations.

Initially I was able to overlook the stress of the job because of a dedication to our goals, a commit" ment to the process and a feeling that I could contribute to communications within the Alliance and with the public.

But over time several political problems became evident. First, the staff receives little help with the work of statewide networking and resource exchange. Certainly such tasks can drain the energy of local groups and little can be done by geographically removed member groups.

But this is no excuse for the low input of support and participation the staff receives. This lack of input is often an intentional avoidance of concrete political differences which people in the AA tend to suppress in favor of "non-violent harmony."

Many issues .have arisen which required immediate attention, but in which the organization showed little interest. These included vital tasks like setting up budgets and conferences, reviewing the planning of the Financial District Action, etc. As a consequence the staff was forced to make decisions -- and later was criticized for acting out of process. But where are the task groups and collectives that should be doing this work?

It is a political embarrassment for me to associate with the AA at this time. We are an extraordinarily self-centered, white, middle-class group of moralists. Our lip service is in direct conflict with our activities.

I've tried to maintain hope that our strategy for social change would include coalition building with ethnic minorities and the "working class," but in fact, this has never been realized as a priority in our actions.

Our articulated goal of a democratic, integrated mass movement has no relation to the process we use or to the types of actions enjoyed by the AA. Each activist must take personal responsibility for crossing class and racial lines. A democratic future means taking the risk of finding out who "the people" really are, and discovering what we need to do to support one another.

The world is not going to change because we believe that our position is morally above reproach. Civil disobedience does not effectively agitate for meaningful work or equal opportunity in this society. Loving each other will not automatically cause corporations to give up their power.

[[category:anti-nuclear]] [[category:1980s]] [[category:Dissent]]