A Community That Fights: Difference between revisions

m (caption, credits, links)
(added video)
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''<font face = Papyrus> <font color = maroon> <font size = 4>Historical Essay</font></font> </font>'''
''by Herb Mills'' <br>from '''The San Francisco Waterfront: The Social Consequences of Industrial Modernization, Part One: The Good Old Days'''
[[Image:1933 stevedore strike AAD-4948.jpg]]
'''1933 stevedore strike on San Francisco waterfront.'''
''Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library''
<iframe src="http://archive.org/embed/HerbMillsAHighlySkilledJob" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" allowfullscreen></iframe>
'''Herb Mills on longshoring work and solidarity in the hold.'''
''Video: Chris Carlsson and Steve Stallone''
[[Image:ilwu2$longshore-scrap-demo-1937.jpg]]
[[Image:ilwu2$longshore-scrap-demo-1937.jpg]]


'''Demo against scrap metal to Japan, 1937 '''
'''Demo against scrap metal to Japan, 1937 '''
''Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library''


By the late 1930s, San Francisco longshoremen could walk the Embarcadero and work the docks and ships with a very considerable dignity. The most concrete expression of that dignity. . . was a quite extraordinary on-the-job militancy.
By the late 1930s, San Francisco longshoremen could walk the Embarcadero and work the docks and ships with a very considerable dignity. The most concrete expression of that dignity. . . was a quite extraordinary on-the-job militancy.


There were three distinct, yet frequently interrelated components to this militancy: (1) the enforcement of the contract, (2) an insistence upon safety, and (3) an insistence that the work proceed sensibly. Broadly speaking, an effective militancy could be exercised by the men simply because their employer was fundamentally dependent upon their initiative and good will. . . Because of the experience, skills and innovative talent which he brought to the job, the good longshoreman could routinely exercise a very effective job control when in his judgement that seemed necessary. . . The men upon whom the employer could most readily rely for a really first class stevedoring job and a very conscientious performance of the work were men who were viewed by their fellow workers as the very best of union men and the most militant of their union brothers.
There were three distinct, yet frequently interrelated components to this militancy: (1) the enforcement of the contract, (2) an insistence upon safety, and (3) an insistence that the work proceed sensibly. Broadly speaking, an effective militancy could be exercised by the men simply because their employer was fundamentally dependent upon their initiative and good will. . . Because of the experience, skills and innovative talent which he brought to the job, the good longshoreman could routinely exercise a very effective job control when in his judgement that seemed necessary. . . The men upon whom the employer could most readily rely for a really first class stevedoring job and a very conscientious performance of the work were men who were viewed by their fellow workers as the very best of union men and the most militant of their union brothers.
[[Image:Longshore-wildcat-against-no-smoking-rule-pier-22-1943.jpg]]
'''Quick job-action against new "no smoking" policy, 1943. '''
''Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library''


The ability and willingness to undertake disciplined and well-planned job action, i.e., work-stoppages or mini-strikes of limited scope and short duration, became the very hallmark of the San Francisco longshoremen. . . While the men were destined to evolve a great number of ways of collectively expressing and, therefore, experiencing their community with one another, job action was for years ''the'' mass, democratic form. It was also the most direct, immediate and vibrant. As a collective expression and experience of community, job action was a veritable fountainhead of organizational lan and individual verve. By concretely reminding the men of the nature of their struggle and of the means whereby disputes and grievances might be resolved to their satisfaction, it was also destined to play a vital role in their evolution and self-education as a community. Hence, the militancy of these men was . . . the most complete expression and embodiment of their occupational satisfaction.
The ability and willingness to undertake disciplined and well-planned job action, i.e., work-stoppages or mini-strikes of limited scope and short duration, became the very hallmark of the San Francisco longshoremen. . . While the men were destined to evolve a great number of ways of collectively expressing and, therefore, experiencing their community with one another, job action was for years ''the'' mass, democratic form. It was also the most direct, immediate and vibrant. As a collective expression and experience of community, job action was a veritable fountainhead of organizational lan and individual verve. By concretely reminding the men of the nature of their struggle and of the means whereby disputes and grievances might be resolved to their satisfaction, it was also destined to play a vital role in their evolution and self-education as a community. Hence, the militancy of these men was . . . the most complete expression and embodiment of their occupational satisfaction.


- Herb Mills, ''The San Francisco Waterfront: The Social Consequences of Industrial Modernization, Part One: The Good Old Days''
[[Image:Sept-1945-maritime-workers-mass-meeting-on-waterfront-to-discuss-strike-AAD-5542.jpg]]
 
'''Maritime workers publicly mass to discuss a strike in September 1945.'''
 
''Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library''
 
 
[[Image:Watefront workers meet june 6 1946 AAD-5543.jpg]]
 
'''Waterfront workers in mass meeting June 6, 1946.'''
 
''Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library''
 
 
<iframe src="https://archive.org/embed/LongshoremenAtWork" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
'''This film spans the twenty-five years of ILWU longshore history in San Francisco and Oakland from 1969 to 1994. Its images and sounds recount a dramatic story of change in our working lives, our industry, and our port.''' First produced in 1979, it was shown at poetry readings presented by Waterfront Writers and Artists. Now transferred to DVD, this work of art stands as both a memorial to our colorful past and a tribute to our work and our union with one another.
 
''This film was filmed and composed by: Brian Nelson, ILWU Ship Clerk Local 34, retired; Frank Silva, ILWU Ship Clerk Local 34, retired; Michael Vawter, ILWU Longshore Local 10, active.''




[[Image:ilwu2$longshore-job-action-1943.jpg]]
 


'''Quick job-action against new “no smoking” policy, 1943. '''


''photos: San Francisco Public Library ''
[[50th Anniversary of 1934 General Strike | Prev. Document]]  [[ Mechanization on the Waterfront | Next Document]]


[[50th Anniversary of 1934 General Strike | Prev. Document]]  [[ Mechanization on the Waterfront | Next Document]]
[[category:Labor]] [[category:ILWU]] [[category:1930s]] [[category:1940s]] [[category:1950s]] [[category:1960s]] [[category:1970s]]

Revision as of 15:43, 24 October 2016

Historical Essay

by Herb Mills
from The San Francisco Waterfront: The Social Consequences of Industrial Modernization, Part One: The Good Old Days

1933 stevedore strike AAD-4948.jpg

1933 stevedore strike on San Francisco waterfront.

Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library

<iframe src="http://archive.org/embed/HerbMillsAHighlySkilledJob" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Herb Mills on longshoring work and solidarity in the hold.

Video: Chris Carlsson and Steve Stallone


Ilwu2$longshore-scrap-demo-1937.jpg

Demo against scrap metal to Japan, 1937

Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library


By the late 1930s, San Francisco longshoremen could walk the Embarcadero and work the docks and ships with a very considerable dignity. The most concrete expression of that dignity. . . was a quite extraordinary on-the-job militancy.

There were three distinct, yet frequently interrelated components to this militancy: (1) the enforcement of the contract, (2) an insistence upon safety, and (3) an insistence that the work proceed sensibly. Broadly speaking, an effective militancy could be exercised by the men simply because their employer was fundamentally dependent upon their initiative and good will. . . Because of the experience, skills and innovative talent which he brought to the job, the good longshoreman could routinely exercise a very effective job control when in his judgement that seemed necessary. . . The men upon whom the employer could most readily rely for a really first class stevedoring job and a very conscientious performance of the work were men who were viewed by their fellow workers as the very best of union men and the most militant of their union brothers.

Longshore-wildcat-against-no-smoking-rule-pier-22-1943.jpg

Quick job-action against new "no smoking" policy, 1943.

Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library

The ability and willingness to undertake disciplined and well-planned job action, i.e., work-stoppages or mini-strikes of limited scope and short duration, became the very hallmark of the San Francisco longshoremen. . . While the men were destined to evolve a great number of ways of collectively expressing and, therefore, experiencing their community with one another, job action was for years the mass, democratic form. It was also the most direct, immediate and vibrant. As a collective expression and experience of community, job action was a veritable fountainhead of organizational lan and individual verve. By concretely reminding the men of the nature of their struggle and of the means whereby disputes and grievances might be resolved to their satisfaction, it was also destined to play a vital role in their evolution and self-education as a community. Hence, the militancy of these men was . . . the most complete expression and embodiment of their occupational satisfaction.

Sept-1945-maritime-workers-mass-meeting-on-waterfront-to-discuss-strike-AAD-5542.jpg

Maritime workers publicly mass to discuss a strike in September 1945.

Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library


Watefront workers meet june 6 1946 AAD-5543.jpg

Waterfront workers in mass meeting June 6, 1946.

Photo: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library


<iframe src="https://archive.org/embed/LongshoremenAtWork" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This film spans the twenty-five years of ILWU longshore history in San Francisco and Oakland from 1969 to 1994. Its images and sounds recount a dramatic story of change in our working lives, our industry, and our port. First produced in 1979, it was shown at poetry readings presented by Waterfront Writers and Artists. Now transferred to DVD, this work of art stands as both a memorial to our colorful past and a tribute to our work and our union with one another.

This film was filmed and composed by: Brian Nelson, ILWU Ship Clerk Local 34, retired; Frank Silva, ILWU Ship Clerk Local 34, retired; Michael Vawter, ILWU Longshore Local 10, active.



Prev. Document Next Document